THE MAYOR IN REPLY.
(To the Editor “Stratford Post.”), 'Sir,rr-I am not a professional accountant, neither is Mr. Kirkwood, and I suspect our opinion on the correctness or otherwise of the figures given in the circular in question is much of a muchness. I read the circular as any plain non-professional man would read it, “and as it was intended the ratepayers of Stratford should read it”—namely,- that if Prohibition should be carried it will become necessary to increase the rates by £619. That this is what those responsible for the circular intended the ratepayers to understand would actually happen is proved by the statement at the foot of the circular: “The above not only affects property owners, rents always rise with rates.” It is true that the author of the circular has cunningly mixsd up the questions of general and local revenue so as to afford a loophole for escape when tackled. The circular is a specimen of that worst kind of lie—a half truth—of which so many have been sown broadcast by the Trade during this contest. It is worded with intent to deceive. The idea that the loss in general revenue will be made up by extra local rates, or even by ratepayers alone to the exclusion of non-ratepayers, is preposterous. The revenue will be, more than made up by the Customs duties collected on the goods bought with money that will then not be spent on liquor, and as a very large annual saving will be made in the maintenance of gaols, lock-ups, police stations, hospitals, lunatic asylums, and the like, and on the pay of magistrates, police, warders, hospital attendants, excise meu ; etc., it will not be necessary to raise so large a revenue. By the way, can anyone explain why a falling-off of £573,000 from a total revenue of, say, £8,000,000, which is about 7 per cent., should necessitate a rise of from 30 to 50 per cent, on the taxation ? This is what the circular says, and it seems to need explanation.—l am, etc., J. MASTERS.*
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/STEP19111206.2.18.2
Bibliographic details
Stratford Evening Post, Volume XXXI, Issue 96, 6 December 1911, Page 5
Word Count
343THE MAYOR IN REPLY. Stratford Evening Post, Volume XXXI, Issue 96, 6 December 1911, Page 5
Using This Item
Copyright undetermined – untraced rights owner. For advice on reproduction of material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.