APPEAL COURT.
(Per Press Association J Wellington, October 5
The Appeal unit to-day took the case Rex v. Alary drown, a case of concealment of (>n tii. it was admitted by vue Crown unit,the evidence of cue identity of me ciiiicl was unsanslactory, a.;d the question tor mu Court is wiic-ther, in \icw of tins, prisoner was i igntiy convicted. Mr. Hunter, t Christduuch, appeared for prisoner, and tuu Solicitor-ueneral lor cue Crown.
in me case Schmidt and Bcllshaw v. Greenwood, tno Court- intimated mat ir inoy doicrmiaou mat a plea of fraud could not be raised by tne respondent or there was evidence or negative hand, that tlie farther question of whether the representation as to tiie area cl grasseu land entitled respondent to compensation would he reserved to be argued before a stronger Court. Counsel confined their argument lu the question of fraud, anti me Court then resolved decision on that point. Wellington, October 5.
The Court reserved judgment in the case of ilex v. Biown.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/STEP19111005.2.36
Bibliographic details
Stratford Evening Post, Volume XXXI, Issue 43, 5 October 1911, Page 6
Word Count
168APPEAL COURT. Stratford Evening Post, Volume XXXI, Issue 43, 5 October 1911, Page 6
Using This Item
Copyright undetermined – untraced rights owner. For advice on reproduction of material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in