Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Fighter Planes in the Pacific

AMERICAN war correspondents have lately drawn attention to the need for better fighter planes on the North Australian front. The Japanese Zero has been repeatedly mentioned as a formidable opponent: indeed, so much has been said about this machine that newspaper readers may be wondering if the enemy has produced something superlatively good. Mr William Dunn, correspondent of the Columbia broadcasting system, was reported on Saturday to have quoted comments by American pilots. “The Zeros have a higher operation ceiling than the ships these lads are using,” he said. “The Japanese know it, and are always taking advantage of it.” This story has been heard before; yet the fact remains that Zeros have usually been beaten when they encountered the P4O (the Tomahawk) or the P4OE (the Kittyhawk). In China, for instance, the American Volunteer Group destroyed more than 300 Japanese planes and lost only 16 of their own. It is true that the Zero can outclimb the Tomahawk. But the P4O is faster, can out-dive the Zero, and is able to stand much more punishment.

Similarly, it was claimed that the P 39, the Airacobra, climbed too slowly at high altitudes, and could therefore be easily out-manoeuvred by the Japanese. Yet American pilots shot down eight Zeros in their first combat, and brought all their Airacobras safely home. Latest proof of the vulnerability of the Zero came yesterday in a report that seven out of 20 Japanese fighters were destroyed by heavy bombers in air battles over the Solomon Islands. Flying Fortresses can climb even higher than the Zeros, although they are not nearly as fast. But operational flights are not all at high altitudes. There are many occasions when fighters must go into action at low levels if they are to perform their work of interception. Most of

the Zeros may have been destroyed in those circumstances. They will continue to be dangerous in fighter combats, however, until machines with a higher ceiling can be used against them. Those planes are already being produced. The twinengined P3B (Lightning) is said to have an excellent altitude performance, great speed and crushing gunpower. Even better, according to expert opinion, is the P 47 (Thunderbolt), described by one commentator as a 2000 horse-power monster which “climbs like a home-sick angel.” Both these planes are on their way to the battle-fronts. When they go into action the Japanese will ■have to look around for something better than the Zero.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ST19420811.2.24

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Southland Times, Issue 24819, 11 August 1942, Page 4

Word count
Tapeke kupu
412

Fighter Planes in the Pacific Southland Times, Issue 24819, 11 August 1942, Page 4

Fighter Planes in the Pacific Southland Times, Issue 24819, 11 August 1942, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert