THE MUNN CASE
MAY GO TO COURT OF APPEAL. ADMISSABILITY OF CERTAIN EVIDENCE. (Per United Prose Association.) Auckland, May 28. It is regarded as almost certain that the Court of Appeal will be called upon to consider the admissibility of certain evidence which was heard during the Munn trial, but no definite decision on the matter has yet been reached. On the first day of the hearing in the Supreme Court, counsel for the defence, Mr E. IL Northcroft, raised an objection to the hearing of the evidence of the children of Munn’s first marriage regarding the relations existing between accused and his wife during the 12 months prior to her death. Mr Northcroft asked the judge to reserve the question for the Court of Appeal and he 'did so. It is stated that the grounds of the objection are that the evidence did not deal with the actual offence, but was calculated to prejudice Munn. The Court of Appeal has power to order a new trial or quash the conviction if it upholds the objection.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ST19300529.2.59
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Southland Times, Issue 21095, 29 May 1930, Page 7
Word count
Tapeke kupu
176THE MUNN CASE Southland Times, Issue 21095, 29 May 1930, Page 7
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Southland Times. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in