ORIGINAL CORRESPONDENCE.
WE DO NOT IDENTIFY OUBSBLYBS IV ANY WAY WITH THB -OPINIONS EXPBESSBD BY OUB COBBESPONDENTS. •» PEPLY. (TO THE EDITOB OF THE SOtTCHIAND TIMES). Sib, — We have to state Mr Rose's assertion that our firm sought to obtfin a share in his almanac is a palps ble untruth. It is simply absurd to suppoia that we could identify ourselves with such a very poor burlesque on the n»ne of almanac. It is also untrue that we authorised any gentleman connected with our establishment to assert that Mr Eose did not intend to publish his work this year. We never troubled ourselves to inquire whether that individual contemplated doing so. This closes the correspondence on our part. — We are, &c, Beynolds & Co. lnvercargill, August 25th, 1868.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ST18680826.2.11
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Southland Times, Issue 1010, 26 August 1868, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
126ORIGINAL CORRESPONDENCE. Southland Times, Issue 1010, 26 August 1868, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in