Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT.

(Before H. M'Culloch, Esq., E. M.) THURSDAY, 31st MAY. "W. Thompson and J. M'Donald, were each fined 10s, or 24 hours' imprisonment for drnnkenness. E. Stevens, charged with -wilfully damaging property, was discharged. Civil Cases. CRACK V. DOIfKE. In this case the plaintiff claimed £2 6s 6d, for work done at the Theatre during the engagement of the Stevens' Troupe for whom the defendant acts as manager Verdict for Plaintiff with costs. FRIDAY, Ist JUNE. T. Mitchell, W. Stories, John and Tommy a colored crew charged with deserting the whaling Brig " Amherst " were remanded to Campbelltown. Civil Cases. • J. STEWART V. MARTIN. This action arose from an engagement entered into by Martin to employ the Plaintiff as managing brewer at the Black Eagle Brewery Invercargill. After Stewart entered on his duties and not giving satisfaction to the defendant he was summarily dis nissed and now claimed £11 Is *Bd. wages due and expenses back to Dunedic. It seemed that j the defendant did not allow plaintiff full j control and in the several brews undertaken during his engagement. The Bench ruled that he had been wrongfully dismissed and gave judgment for plaintiff for full amount claimed and costs. MARTIN V. STEWART. • In this action Martin claimed from Stewart £20, the value of sundry casks of beer said to have been spoiled by the bad management of the defendant. Verdict however was given for defendant with costs. <"*?' J. CAHILL V. J. FORD. Claim for board £9 Is 6d, no appearance of either party. KINGSWELL V. DIXON. For goods sold £12 8s 3d. For plaintiff with costs, for full amount claimed. ROSS V. SOUTH. For goods Bold £7 19s. For plaintiff with costs for full amouut claimed. ! ROSS V. SINCLAIR. Claim for £12 7s 3d, goods sold. For plaintiff with costs for full amount. ROSS V. BIRT. For goods sold £8 4s. For plaintiff with,; costs for full amount. : SATUEDAY, 2nd JUNE. :

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ST18660604.2.8

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Southland Times, Volume III, Issue 273, 4 June 1866, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
323

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Southland Times, Volume III, Issue 273, 4 June 1866, Page 2

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Southland Times, Volume III, Issue 273, 4 June 1866, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert