Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

LEGAL OPINIONS ON MURDER.

If the eminent men who were examined by the Eoyal Commission on Capital Punishment were agreed upon what murder is as the the moralist regards it, they differed in their definition of the crime in its legal aspects. Lord Cranworth says, whenever any person is committing an act of violence which he knows may probably result in death, and he nevertheless prosecutes that violence, and it does result in death, that must be considered a premeditated murder. He thinks it would be very wrong if an intention to kill were considered necessary. Mr. Avory, the clerk of arraigns at the Central Criminal Court, considered it would be murder if an officer of justice going to enforce the law were killed through being pushed down stairs and striking against some obstruction at the bottom. Mr J. Eitzjames Stephen narrated a case in which three lads were sentenced to death for the fatal consequences of a blow which one of them struck an old gentleman, in order to make him stoop forward, so that the others might snatch his Avatch from his pocket. Serjeant Parry, on the other hand, describes his idea of a murder to be "a. prepared murder— prepared and planned beforehand." "I reject," he added, " anyjj definition of murder which would include a man in a sudden burst of passion killing another. I say that this is not, and ought not to be, murder." When a woman giving birth to a natural child kills it in order to conceal the birth, Lord Cranworth would hardly say that any one is murdered, "It, i s rather as if the child never came into the world than that, having come into it, it is murdered." The question naturally arose, if it is not murder in the mother's case, would it be murder in the midwife's or the father's? Lord Cranworth was decided upon this. The mother, he said, has influence operating on her which cannot affect any other person ; Bhe .is hardly conscious of her acts — hardly a responsible agent. Mr Walpole, staking the same view, was careful to add, the influences were those arising from the, consideration of illegitimacy. The killing of a legitimate child he would still wish to be regarded as murder. — Daily News. — — ■ *

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ST18660601.2.16

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Southland Times, Volume III, Issue 272, 1 June 1866, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
380

LEGAL OPINIONS ON MURDER. Southland Times, Volume III, Issue 272, 1 June 1866, Page 3

LEGAL OPINIONS ON MURDER. Southland Times, Volume III, Issue 272, 1 June 1866, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert