RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT.
'ax: V(Before^^ \ A.,. Tttesd.ay,..3l'st May, 1864."' " "" V Hoad r, Miimtf.— Case, settled out of couiftl '" Cameron v. Campbell' and Robertson. ; I ; : This .was an -action* tp> rpc»ver^£2(£ for professional" servicea as an architect, in surveying,&c.,at tho Bluff, andj for -preparing plans for a pro-- . posed .Bjranch of . the»BankYof.. Otago, .atJiivertbn.* Mr. Weston appeared for the plaintiff, and MrV Harvey foe defendants. y~>- | Mr. Cameron, being examined, said lie, in connection witbf Mr." Elliott,"' another architect, had been five days engaged on;the- works on?tho Bluff -Road? arid the charge for siich •services Svas*£& 2s. per diem. This amounted -tb.- £lO 10s., and tlio remaining £9alQs:. .was tint charge for getting ud a* preliminary sketch_.pf_ the bank. afc. Riverfcpn. Plaintiff stated that he had/been feqUestc'dJtty^Mr. 'GSSai>bfeh f tb prepare a'stetchof '.grdutfcl^ldii apd'i *elevatibn" bf '*tlfo'«huMing,''to^sh.6-^-'to"';]i_i'.' Jaime- < . son, the agent of the -bank. ■'- TKisV-waa? 'done, and pMr M ..Campbell «, nest • afternoon fof-tnem, but as they were scarcely 5 finished, he jwtdtedjahput an hpUr-iiinfcil .thojdimensioiis»ofj'tiie "rooms were filled in, after wliich he took thorn ito Messrs. Mueller andiGaisow, who were acting fojtl the- bank tin the matter* and , who,; My. Camjibbll jpiidj/; would do as"' well as . Mr. Jamiesbn., ' ,,i; Ijerird nothing mbrb of ; them; juntil; last Saturdayj' wlxeii-. they Vere returned., I-havenot seeh-MrVCainp- .. 'ifeUsinbd. T'sent'iri my accoiint 'abpiit'six,- weeks *"*" Crb'ss-'biaiSm'id-^ TKe -plans; ,pi«du^d.r .^rb^fiio pnes.in question. The usual-charge fojf'pvbjKiritig* preliminary plans is one per bent, on- the estimated ' cost pOhe^buildijigi .^Bping,aske&£if stjJd pja^is,. werp "got .up in a professional-like manner, splaintjiffj said they wfere qtnte'gobdfenbbgh for.&'pref>'ai%atoi*y sketchy, Beibg. father. asked'.whyhe-had not sejiit -ihhisitccbunfcTor theJ£9~lo&. fiortr claimed* he said he had not done. sb in "'the belief ; that the building .would have b^enjgpnp;pn;;with!:. ■■• . .*•• j £«« . EUiptt cprrp,bqrated f tlie -^evidence of the,, plaintiff as : i^^ae'dvthe' Vork rpxxTfiicr Bluif RodtL ' ". This wa^fiie'l^c'fof •'ihe^pw'sbbutibn^- ''•" | I V ". 'Mi. Harvey, fwtiib'.defenco^ ; pleaded "ijofcm--debted" in the amri'bf £9 IOs;, as defehdantjs had' never employed Mr. Cameron to prej)are planp ; and until they liadlroceived'fcKe' summons to attend at court, had never been /-made ;. aware of the_ •charges, .., ,As, a^gardsrthb £1Q lOs.jjhpWbuid shbw that plaintiff .was not engaged *.five..d^ys, aa he ha&charged for.- .,A .?. ]i*..&.iA.'f .-■';<'■<:''%■. :■.: \f : - : bemg^. .examined,,; explained,- that . as_spmej niisundbratandingfliad .arjseii bet!wixt tne 'Government,, and (fefendaiit^ fne;asiufe?i -mertts'of ""sbmo* 1 , he had e&x- ■ plowed Messrs. Cam|fp^i , a^ for the purpose of chebk^ng :fc)ie, Gpv^nini^nifc ntea--surcments. He accb^anlpd. themr They were not on the ground oh ;the^ iS(h February, the., third day charged .for. BlrY;C!amerpn afterwards told me thafc,..jthpy v had. Vbeen- . inspecting Mr. > Davi_' railway the, Y23rd,; having made a misteVe.^,.,;cbuntihg:the/eid-vfe*rt^, Mr. • Cameron accompanied -by'iMr^^berispri proceeded again to the ' Bluff YbF the purpose jof ascertaining 'the corrfedt humber. Mr. Campion s^d" there ..w'oMd^ba^cßbhai'gbs; made, it having been an omission on his part when formerly on the spot. In reference to the plans -for the^Banki ■'■-'bf "OtaTgopMr? Campbell * disliinctly - stoted- tiiatthe; never ..requested plaintiff j toTpre'pare ' them: fHe; had , been vßho-wxi, some ; ,plans 5r whiclir plaintiff had formerly got up for alike, erectipn|at„ BaUakrat;, !j and'out of kindness' tO'him and'lpiow-; ing Mr. Jamicson, he -had promised to Tecoinmehd him as architect. This : was all that; passed. J Mr. Geisow and;M^Yßobert^n,b.emg briefly examined, and r counselYpn ..both 7 A iiidcs having, >addressedthe'Gbuffc,"the7Bencli found as far as the works, ori .the Road were concerned, a specnic*; agreement^;liad'bebn^ eri tered into,, and^warded. for plaintiff; in,; th&Bum';bf^ Ssi, fbr.fow days' services. v The'demand'f6r preparatibn'of plans -fo*r*" the proposed ibranch" bank' wa3 disallowed,. «iefendants having proved that they were* neither in a position to order^the-same,; nbrha^done so. ■ Judgment was accordingly given in favor of--plaintiff for £8 8s. "~~~ . (AS. gaM'HMN.VttCoNKEMiMb H-GGABT? | I; > |j i -Cl^tt,fpr^2ft.fp^Bpda^ S»BPhgd. tK i^Bet-fi; off for put'iri'*By"defendants f .fpr 1 the* board and lodging of sister and brothor-nvlawVof plaintiff. m ' „ .'» • f •:■• Irf-'^e'xamm-ttibn, he luidj. never at any time agreed to become liable for tiis" Be ( t-pff. ,- rj-rf V- -.^ ?;>■ ■ -A-"' '■' «* rJ>i ¥iid r *M ; agisb , atc'niled that if Buch guarantee liad; ■ been given it shouldxhave.'heehGinifWi3itirig, and" „producedLin_avidence.,.. —^..,„....^™. — .~rr~A -Vi-*|i "* v The case was dismissed, costs being divided, .j . 71 ALAi. SATSH Ax, ''-"'-' C i) SAVtAA ]' < V W^pjiESDAT,. Jot*e 1, 1864. . "'"'! ' Mary Horton^charged''' with being tjiid diepgdeflylih EsklßfeeetS-wiiß fihed-iOi^ or forty-; eight hours imprisonment.^ , „ { v ' ..CIVIL. CASES. , rr South v Hottse. : v ~^<3aiffi^f6r~£6*6s:;'^ services in^ conducting a case before the/Residjpnt 'Magistrate's Court.;"" ' JlJ '""' .'.'*-;■ "" j .-,; DefehdjmtYi*ia&'dlthat:he had paid. £3 65.; tb; "accpunt. '--A~. ,' .. '.. :■: '■■''-* yrjfxt^^m^pxt^p^dms^'y yr rj \ CES u : m?H •>^k-LTtmH^Kdyh^ l . * iX •: • '.j Claim for £9 28r*~Judgment for plaintiff jfor" /amount^with-cps^s,.;,- . , r \,.;,.- & Ai<«A Ai T '"• ■> *~'A f-"'H» Xl^^Xl^^^^^^mrn'' . .*, H f ,«? '■Aj Caaimj-fpr; |i'pn .an .•I^O.'Ui-.which^ef^d^ 'prpvedYhiad ''bebnf^paid< to, t plamtrjKs' .-, partner. ' ' Judgment for defendant. .*>-•, . - : ■jA' ■ ) y> -. .. M'DQKALD.V.'FEITEg. . : A -li .Claim for .£3, 105. for value of watch lpftiii, H^iH* sV:ia^'''Vbi<*H5 V : ia^'''Vbi<*H in"
•piSintiC^ - abseribe? 'J'l Judgment .'for plamtiff for amount'V'm.fchii^Ccpstal'-' -.-''-^Y . .-. • „_^_^*>^.~,^COSTflß - "— " Action for ;price.pf cattle, ., to bo- deUy"cred at; defendant's TBtocKyardi- fit. ":^me put: inTevidence •thatjihe"cattlb .^erp;.*ripCyei dieliv^red ivihe -placo v ; Th^ ca^e^^siadjpuniedu., fpr^a w;eek* ' iA^'x* Air 'A -■"*| w y , ** i *, , "***" , ***>"^"^T* > ".' '"' A A( "' ' '
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ST18640602.2.19
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Southland Times, Volume I, Issue 1, 2 June 1864, Page 3
Word count
Tapeke kupu
823RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Southland Times, Volume I, Issue 1, 2 June 1864, Page 3
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.