Untitled

Southland Times, Volume 2, Issue 110, 4 November 1863, Page 3

hsptT MAGISTRATE'S COURT, Monday, 3rd Nov. 1863. jßefore M. Price, Esq., K.M.) iftfgY. — iTamcs M'Fherson for an eftfj^fhst decency in the public streets bed £5, or in default committed to i for fourteen days. iBoTTLE AND JIMS -PeFAUTMENT. persons' names adorned the list for enn^ss — one preferred forfeiture of bail ng arraigned in the the dock, and did jper ; the other five were fined -Ss each. M. CASES — EXTENDED JURISDICTION. 'CBIBP V. JLSGV3 claim "for hire of a horse, and loss susIb}' subsequent detention. Harvey appeared for the plaintiff, icdonald for the flefenGant. ppeared that the defendant obtained sion from plaintiff to use a horsebelong-, Him latter. The horse was on the run, i going for it, defendant 'took -the wrong and not that which he had permission '■', the claim consequently was for horse and loss by detention. The.plaintiff got lict with costs. M'LEOD V. M'DONAED. im for i£3o, the balance of the price of a sold to defendant. Verdict by default. 'KOIISFALIi V. FORD tdict by default. MU.VRO V. MAXFIEtD. him for the recover} of the rent of a in Dee street. The sifbstance of the cc was, that plaintiff ! had failed to iy with all the terms of the agreemeht (putting shutters to the shop windows. iL'erichgave a verdict for <he amount, sd, with an - order for deferring execumtil the shutters referred to had been teted. ' ■ . SOPER V. HAGGIN. ■laira for board dnfl loaging. The deit had omitted to state his defence in i inity with the "rules ot the Court, and ' ench^gave a verdict for the plaintiff. fe were 'Several tfftier cases, some of 1 were remanded to a future day, and ■ settled out of ICourt. Tuesday, 3rd S"o-vemb«r. °bancy. — Mary Ann Anderson and wee M*Ken2ie*were eliargefl, under the a nt Act, as being disorderly characters. "idence of neighbors living near the K cupied by the prisoners, situated near ' lospital, went far to prove that the fewas a prostitute, keeping a common el, and fhat the/male prisoner officiated protector/ The latter stating that lie bring forward evidence that he gained felihood Ijy horiesft means, the case was nded for that purpose. '! , IVIL CASES — EXTEM&KD JURISDiCTIOX. CLARK V. CAMERON. M'Donald fez plaintiff; Mr 6outh for idant. is was a case, remanded from the prepay, for the recovery of £80, damages ti to have been sustained by the illegal "ion of a mare, the property of the tiff. A great number of witnesses were Ito prove that the mare -was the - pro--[of plaintiff, and the Bench, gave a ver•n his favor. M'ILAY V KINOSATELI.. South for plaintiff. Mr Westbn'fdr the dant. 'action to recover LBO damages alleged ly e been sustained, .partly by the non-. ! ent for the hire ot. a punt, and partly by Pendant having sunk the punt. er hearing a host of witnesses, the Bench Hthat the defenaant was liable for the ¥ ~i punt, and gave a verdict for LSO. \ 3ant gave notice of appeal.

'ooßivo the Least of Two Eras.— A n g wine merchant haying sent a tfeof wine to Earl Derby, ,which he fed was a specific for the pout,'sabemly wrote asking for an order. The Replied, presented his compliments *•- — , &c, and begged lo.say he. had tli^ wjnc senf, hut— preferred the