PEARE v. PEARE.

Shannon News, 14 August 1923, Page 5

PEARE v. PEARE.

$ APPLICATION FOR RESTITUTION OF CONJUGAL RIGHTS. A petition ior restitution oi conjugal rights was made by Alice Marguerite Peare, of Palmerston North, in respect to her husband, Ernest Charles Pearq, also of Palmerston N. Mr Ongley appeared lor petitioner, respondent, who did not appear, being unrepresented by counsel. petitioner stalked in her evidence that she was married to respondent at Aldershot, England, on February 18, 1919. Alter coming out tQ 'New Zealand the parties lived at Wtellington, Levin and Palmerston Nortn, and there was onq child of the marriage. On or about October 18 last her husband had ceased to cohabit with her and had eventually told witness to leave the house in which they werq living, or she “would be kicked out.” Witness got rooms and had 1 to sue ber husband for maintenance of tile child. She had several times asked respondent to come back to her, but he had not donq so, though he had paid her maintenance. At this stag© Mr Ongley read a registered letter written by petitioner to respondent asking him to comq back to her. Witness went on to state that respenden had said he did not care ior tier and would not come 'back. Witness had the child in her charge. Petitioner’s landlady gave evidence that when respondent called at tile house it was only to give petitioner money, and he did not come inside except when witness askqd him to do so, and unsuccessfully attempted to persuade him to return to his wife. His Honour made a decree ordering respondent to take his wife back within a fortnight, and to pay £lO 10s costs of the petition. “Better than bullion—good health.” —Markley. During winter, don’t run the risk of catching colds, coughs, or influenza—use Baxter’s Lung Preserver. “Baxter’s” has rich, warming, dependable properties. Never fails to give speedy relief, even in most chronic bronchial chest and throat troubles.