FINED HUNDRED POUNDS.
PENALTY ON MOTORIST WHO*
CAUSED FATALITY
Gisborne, March 16In the Supreme Court, Albert Edmony Bourgeois, who was found guilty of manslaughter with a re-, commendation to mercy, came up for sentence.
The evidence called showed accused bore the reputation of being a careful driver. , Mr Justice Reed said that since the conviction the matter of punishment had occasioned him some anxiety. It was not a case of the usual disregard for public safety. It was not a case which called for punishment or imprisonment. Accused had been negligent, and such negligence brought him under the provisions cf the Crimes Act. Tlie v jury felt that the difference between accused’s negligence and the negligence of others who had done the same and
escaped with a fine for a breach ti the by-law, or escaped altogether.
was that his act caused a collision
which resulted in the death of a hu- , man being. The jury evidently felt the circumstances of a dark' drizzly night, added, to the poorly-lighted
vehicle, was a strong contribution to the cause of the unfortunate result. The negligence called for punishment. A large proportion of motor-
ists habitually disregarded the rules
of the road. It could not he too widely known that where an accident follows and death results, the offender is criminal!v liable, ilis
Honour thought the proper course in this case was to impose a fine of L‘loo, and order the payment of the cost of the prosecution.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/SNEWS19220317.2.11
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Shannon News, 17 March 1922, Page 3
Word count
Tapeke kupu
245FINED HUNDRED POUNDS. Shannon News, 17 March 1922, Page 3
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Copyright undetermined – untraced rights owner. For advice on reproduction of material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.