LIBEL DEFINED.
Referring to the oft-discussed question of “What is libel?” an English contemporary says : —“ Perhaps some journalists who have the fear of the libel law constantly in mind may find a useful hint in the following anecdote : In the reign of Queen Elizabeth, one Peter Palmer, of Lincolns Inn, brought an action against a barrister of the name of Boyce, for Laving, with the intention to injure him in his name and practice, said, * Peter Palmer is a paltry lawer, and hath as much law as a jakanapes.’ It was moved in arrest that the words would not maintain an action, because'they were not slanderous Had Mr Boyce said, ‘ Mr Palmer had more law than a jackanapes,’ it had been actionable, for then he had lessened the opinion of his learning. But the words were ‘he hath as much law as a jackanapes.’ This was no impeachment of his learning, for every man that hath more law than a jackanapes hath as much. Judge Berkley says it has been adjudged, where a person said of a lawyer that he had as much law as a monkey, that the words were not actionable, because he hath as much law, and more law also than a monkey. But if he had said he hath no more law than a monkey, these words would have been actionable.”
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/SCANT18810204.2.10
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
South Canterbury Times, Issue 2459, 4 February 1881, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
225LIBEL DEFINED. South Canterbury Times, Issue 2459, 4 February 1881, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.