Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Transfer station action

• Come on Chris Ryan, stop being selective and print all the facts, please. I stand by my comment that Council has failed miserably to consult the community. You state that the Waimarino Community Board considered a solid waste management strategy report on 5 May 1994. But you fail to point out part 6.2 of that report states, "The essential part of the project is public consultation and public education". This wasn't the role of the WCB. It was management' s role. Why wasn't this carried out for the Orautoha Transfer Station? Is it because you terminated the employment of Mr Tim Mills who was handling the waste projects? Chris, look again at the minutes of the WCB, 6 October 1994. You state the WCB did not resolve to seek a further report on the matter. Stop playing with words and print all the facts. The minutes state, "The Environmental Asset Manager be asked to complete a report". That clearly was a request from the board. Just because it's not included in the resolutions doesn' t mean the board didn' t ask for it as your letter implies. As for the matter of granting yourself a non-notified consent without consulting the near neighbour, you consider council right, that's your opinion. You would be struggling to find a lawyer who would agree that you are correct. I wonder why the new site was hastily re-instated after development work when the neighbour started to challenge your consent. Why did Council after years of neglect at the old land-fill site reform and re-metal the access track only weeks before planning to close it? Once again mismanagement, Chris, at the ratepayers' expense. Perhaps you can publicly explain why over $50,000 was utterly wasted on the corner and road after Council employed a dump truck that breached heavy traffic regulations and broke up the seal at the confluence of the Orautoha stream with the Manganui-o-Te-Ao River. I could go on, and will if you keep trying to make me your scape-goat for mismanagement and lack of consultation over the Orautoha Transfer Station. Chris, I hope you will be at the meeting you have called in the Orautoha Hall. We all want to know about your new policy of charging trucks to use the Ruatiti Road.

Winston

Oliver,

Orautoha.

The Bulletin welcomes letters to the editor. While nom de plumes are accepted, we prefer that a letter is published with the name of the writer. Letters should be typed, written on one side of the page only. Letters must be signed as well as having the writers name written legibly, along with a street address and contact telephone number. The editor reserves the right to abridge or reject letters.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/RUBUL19951205.2.14.5

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Ruapehu Bulletin, Volume 13, Issue 615, 5 December 1995, Page 4

Word count
Tapeke kupu
455

Transfer station action Ruapehu Bulletin, Volume 13, Issue 615, 5 December 1995, Page 4

Transfer station action Ruapehu Bulletin, Volume 13, Issue 615, 5 December 1995, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert