A CRITICAL PHASE

Rotorua Morning Post, Volume 3, Issue 659, 11 October 1933, Page 5

A CRITICAL PHASE

EQUALITY, PLUS SAFETY A later message from Rugby says: The problem this week will enter upon an important, perhaps cfitical, phase. The substance of the German observations is generally known, and it is difficult to find any quarter, outside Germany itself, where they have created an impression in an degree favourable or reassuring. In Britain those who in the past have been most sympathetic towards Germany are now most critical of tbe line adopted in their observations which. is described as "unresponsive" and "a step backards." The latest phases of the disarmament problem have been closely examined by the British Cabinet. The delicacy of the situation is fully recognised her->, for the question which rwaits decision is no longer technieal ci* departmental, but political, and is one of general European importance. Concessions Necessary The basis of the agreement among the five great Powers at last December's discussions at Geneva was the acceptance of that formula implied very considerable concessions on the part of both France and Germany; but what has happened since in Germany has greatly increased alarm in France on the ground of security, and the prospect of reconciling the French and German demands presents serious difficulties. The fluidity of the situation offers some hope of success, and it is felt there are grounds for exploration, in fact, the British draft convention has been accepted not only as a basis for discussion, but as the framework within which disarmament decisions can be fitted. (Rec. 7. p.m.) London, October 10. It is understood that the British Government is firmly of the opinion that the Disarmament Conference must evolve a convention on the basis of its draft leaving Germany the responsibility of appending or refusing its signature. It is recognised, however, that there are difficulties in the way^ of bringing the powers to one viewpoint. Cabinet has decided against any measure of German re-armament. British Ministers hold the opinion that there must be no further meaningless delays nor must the issue be shirked by an adjournment. When Mr. Arthur Henderson told the Bureau that there was "no longer any need for technieal discussion but that what was required was political discussion" he expressed the feeling of Cabinet. The Daily Express says that Cabinet is determined to end the Disarmament Conference either with or without something to show for its two years' work. .