IS IT LA
MATAMATA « iOBTABji •OPIjj | NO POlVEii A legal opinioj , a domain board to 'ing of lawn tennij : submitted to the j Board recently fro> | the Municipal Assot J inion had been S06j in view of a nofej had been given at: ing of the Mataia Club, that Sunday Th'e club is a less^ Board of part of h main. The solocitoj case was settled Doyle v. Whiieheot by-law of the Welh cil, that no person j tise golf on any Sm of the Town Belfcj vested-in the eorp«j be bad, as it was j religious rule. % the corporation $ playing of a gam.; could not prohibitj game only on was further of thei that the town boafi main board, in vit$ set out in the Moj Act,- namely, '% valid if a hreaclrvolve a breach oti moral rule" as case quoted, is prs ing such a by-law, stricted to hours j services.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/RMPOST19330929.2.18.1
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Rotorua Morning Post, Volume 3, Issue 649, 29 September 1933, Page 4
Word count
Tapeke kupu
152IS IT LA Rotorua Morning Post, Volume 3, Issue 649, 29 September 1933, Page 4
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
NZME is the copyright owner for the Rotorua Morning Post. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of NZME. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in