Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE JUDICIARY

Although the Judicature Amendment Act specifically lays it down that the judicial bench 1 of New Zealand "shall consist of ! the Chief Justice and eight other I judges," the Government has declined to make any appointment to fill the vacancy created by the retirement of Mr Justice Adams. It is to be presumed, from the terms of this act, that nine judges are required to deal with the normal work of the Supreme Court and Appeal benches, and it is doubtful whether the Government is pursuing a wise course in deliberately restricting this number. It is essential, before anything else, that the machinery of justice should be properly administered and if an insufficiency of iuderes is to be ner-

mitted, this machinery may be impaired. It is true that the work of the criminal courts has to some extent decreased, but civil litigation has not slackened. Undoubtedly the removal of orie judge from the bench will largely increase the work of the remainder and while this' should not affect the consideration given to litigants, it will in all probability make it more difficult for litigants to obtain sitfings, and consequently increase the j costs which they will have to i carry. It is possible, of course, that the Government, remembering the refusal of the judiciary to accept salary reductions under the National Expenditure Adjustment Act, is endeavouring to make the reduction in another way by saving the country the salary of one judge. It must be remembered, however, that a judge has a most important office to fulfil and one that must be above all suspicion of pecuniary embarrassment. The position is one which calls for the very highest qualifications and if justice is to be properly administered, the country cannot adopt any cheese-paring attitude towards its judiciary. A statement by members of the bench would clarify that position and if it can be shown that the non-appointment of another judge is imposing a hardship, the appointment should most certainly be made.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/RMPOST19330922.2.15.1

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Rotorua Morning Post, Volume 3, Issue 643, 22 September 1933, Page 4

Word count
Tapeke kupu
334

THE JUDICIARY Rotorua Morning Post, Volume 3, Issue 643, 22 September 1933, Page 4

THE JUDICIARY Rotorua Morning Post, Volume 3, Issue 643, 22 September 1933, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert