ALLEGED NEG[?]

Rotorua Morning Post, Volume 3, Issue 638, 16 September 1933, Page 4

ALLEGED NEG[?]

BOROUGH sfl ROTORUA RESIDENj^B WRIT CLAIMi^B DAMAGEs^H SUB-DIVISION It is understood that^^l served yesterday by Mr. solicitor of Rotorua, acti^^l of Mr. Albert George the mayor, councillors of Rotorua claiming ing to £100 and such ot^^| the court shall direct alleged negligence of borough in connection ising of' a pr oposed subdfc^H plaintiff's property as a^H the borough council. heen set down for heariaj^H Supreme Court at Haaii^^H next sitting to be heldo^H ■ The writ states that connection with a sub-dfrj^H owned by the plaintiff of Koutu which sub-divi^^H proved by the council 21. The plaintiff, being disposing of the sections^H 1 sub-lease, it became neces^H sub-divisional plan to bej^H the Land Transfer Officej^H plaintiff was unable 'to council had passed a exempting a road which i^H part of the sub-divisioa -Order-in-C5uncil in ternis^H lution had been gazetted.^H ed that the council passed^^H tion and undertook to necessary information to'^H Works Department forthw^H a title to be given to anyj^H of the sections. It is alaH ever, that the defendaiH| wrongfully neglected to period of five months, being unable to give title chaser until this was done^B 1933. > ■ It is claimed that as a 1 JH alleged negligence of tbe^^H council, the plaintiff lostl|H section 9 of the sub-divisici^B an amount representing |B yearly rental covering a pflj years and ten months charges and taxes wbich^B come payable in respect'iaH tion. It is also claimed .the remaining sections haiHB by the inability to disposei^B tion referred to in the ckijH Specific Claims In his statement of claia^| tiff prays for judgment afflj defendant council for:— H (a) The sum of £25 refl| premium lost on sale of (b) The sum of £25 forl^^ tal and rates under the picfl lease. Q (c) The sum of £25 being^H enhanced value to the seciH (d) The sum of £25 foiH damages. B (e) Any further or ottH which the court shall deem,^