Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

PUBLIC OPINION

The "Post" at all jA correspondence fr nndta'. J must, however b. • that we aficept no our con8* ^ views expressed W | pondents, _ 9 schoolwortsfees i (To the Edit°r) I sir>__I would *jM through the columns rtsfeejl against the ctald ^ olir M they stand at preseia ■ school. v 0f tbe J During the fest ^ ^{0* term the children dM along their fees before^ faV0| the month. 7° . ones f our shillmgs is a m # but to the average P g harder to-day to _ f ees ffeie M than when the sp chance 8® 'established. The_ reduction^B ent has of sfu^Lgto tbf® exemption is by ag0rd t^eH and saying he — in other This is huimhatiK ^.W .and child. In ■-*,#»■ been reduced at lea stepS ■ • cehtanditis^^j taken to reduce the etc, « fees accordingly- 1 am,

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/RMPOST19330601.2.19

Bibliographic details

Rotorua Morning Post, Volume 2, Issue 546, 1 June 1933, Page 4

Word Count
134

PUBLIC OPINION Rotorua Morning Post, Volume 2, Issue 546, 1 June 1933, Page 4

PUBLIC OPINION Rotorua Morning Post, Volume 2, Issue 546, 1 June 1933, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert