[?]AL OF OATH

Rotorua Morning Post, Volume 2, Issue 530, 13 May 1933, Page 5

[?]AL OF OATH

£ iN LORDS E7fe"cT TREATY BEEN TWO JOUNTRIES )f7tfsh citizens Telegraph— 1 Copynglit). ilay 12' 7 p-m> ? London, May 12. L 0f Loi'ds, Lord DanesUnnouncement as to ft ofthe passage of the eoathpastinthe Dail, . was important to the Uole Empire. The pasrdid more than remove ractically abrogated the ;aCt was valid, the Free rjj. existed as a Dominffhat would become of ;nd Others in the Free eeply anxious about the i said that some people iata were told that King jforeign king. In that people living in Great be foreigners ireland behaving m such jt difficult to retain patl "The time will come itdefinitely to say to the hat we think of her atjor made an appeal that i be done to cause fric0inion spirit should be not discouraged. There ion of abrogation of the ffect on Treaty hara, after reading Mr. as's statement in the inmons on May 4, added | Act had no effect on rights of British citizens free State, or upon Artiing for facilities in the irHis Majesty's affairs. be said: "The reason t the treaty is a bargain atBi'itain and the Free i party by unilateral aci the terms of the barferapt by one party to rain has no legal internaEvery citizen born in eisborn with the King's obody so born conld get iigation of allegiance. tances did arise whereState ceased to be part ire a serious question :oncerning the status of itizens in Great Britain. is liypothetical. I have i in saying that the en the two nations caned without consent of bury said that the ati Free State was offeny to Great Britain, but Empire. She should be lad the profound disap>ry Dominion. fort said that Lord Hailnent would allay great eFree State and would i a wise reflective opinnt the Empire.