OTHER FEATURES
AUSTRALIAN SNIVELLING Rec. Jan. 17, 11 p.m. London, January 17. The News Chronicie says: We don't lcnow what reply, if any Marylebone will make to the Australian protest about the leg theory. The whole controversy is rather mystifying. Why is the leg theory not cricket? Why, if applied unfairly, have the umpires said nothing? All fast bowling is dangerous. - The Daily Herald says: Some things are not cricket. One is the snivelling by sections of Austraiians because the . English' bowling tacticians have beaten their best batsmen. The socalled leg theory is many years old. The Austraiians in 1926 did not protest against Root's bowiing because it did nbt worry them.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/RMPOST19330118.2.44.8
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Rotorua Morning Post, Volume 2, Issue 433, 18 January 1933, Page 5
Word count
Tapeke kupu
112OTHER FEATURES Rotorua Morning Post, Volume 2, Issue 433, 18 January 1933, Page 5
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
NZME is the copyright owner for the Rotorua Morning Post. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of NZME. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in