Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE XMAS BONUS

Sir, — In your issue of the appears a letter under the nt j plume of "Workman" who fei eloquent on the subject of fortunate brothers, left high a J as a result of the econoxnic J sion. Evidently to stress his p{M picks as a basis of his argumE.« fact that the legion of the ur^l ed army, 69,000 souls, is to recejj sum of £160,000 as a Christmas >■ With his case for the Go\J employee who through the Ciirj and New Year days falling K Sabbath will receive only onefl holiday instead of the cus::fl three, I am in complete aecoriB The laws of our land stat-H 'every employee of the State « over two months eontmuous® should receive the three day5fl

sincerely hope this will be thl but for one who is fortunate* t'o be in.constant 'employmeiB rate of pay and conditions, thB no comparison to the unemp!;® whom bad times have comefl vengeance. Ef Your correspondent take; M exception to the fact that relislH ers will receive payment for night's work relieved of the of working for it. Did this poi® oeeur to him? Many good® through no fault of their o® been on relief works since t® Ception, simply because no otb® has been offering. Christmas® such as this are rare. ® It ia| evident that he hasi® on relief work or is not very® (ant. The lot of the relief v® indeed hard especially in the® the family man with children,® who has f'aeed adversity in ti® of hard times, I can, withonl® on my imagination, realise fc® of the relief worker who® family to support. ® A case in point. I know c:® sober, intelligent industris:® zen with a family of four, ® dweller, three weeks work at® a "week. Stand down week rei.® weekly wage to £1 17s 6d, S::® odd casual work comes his r® in these times of stress littkH work is offering, and "Wok§|| indignant that the Unern/® Board which works in co/j® with th'e powers that be, sho:® to 69,000 the sum of £160/® Christmas grant. Does not "l®j draw his wages from therer® thig country, and the relief® contributes his mite to keep®| a joh at a rate of pay far®| to that of the relief workagP Where is his sense of jurl« ' bemoans the fact that £160/® ; be provided to enable relief ®| to draw a pittance, so that tijKjE worker can enjoy the fesfe® at home, and perhaps will fejlp supplement his meagre eanj® jobs that corne when Chik^E with us. He evidently camt'.HK ise the fact that others be/gp self contribute to unemplop^B "llef. My own case, I am at p®| Govarnment employee and the end of the year have c;®| £8 in the form of wages tax,®| ing the past three years I ®| fortnnate 'enough to have^g employment for 2i yeatsof^g iad, just over two yea|'3 "^p ernment employ at a gooijg pay, I realise just as all -s[!®| p-ersons should, that the r times of stress should he and willingly contribute to tlllp ation of distress among ^g||| workers who instead of v: j Wm good rate of pay have along on a wage that much heartache to the graol|® women who smilingly mateaK of hard times and make wage provide food and all the family on a margin ®E deed small. Igsi

"Workman" doesn't have t-9® he has continuity of stand down week is not port®S lot. xn the case of the G®|| employee two years ployment entitles him to afj^® holiday on full pay, this :g||| revenue of the country, wails the fact, that the/--^^ *er is going to have a holic-g® In his case, presuming te J® ruiing rate his leave to £5 16s for the two day. Now take the case c'®|| worker. Th'e maximum tia^®p drawn by a man with a f ortnight's spell is £5. A i®|I would only draw £1 in iod. Hard factB but nevei M true. .B® Some of the single 111811 marooned in isolated cani^|®| their home for months. 0. have to he a student of realise after clothes, etc.,^g bought, that the singk is hardly enough to PUG®|| thing for his trip home a' . §®j| and T think the action ij|l p'loyment Boarfi is to h(!l'g|||| not condemned. pSt Tlien there is the case (||||| lief workers" children. as eiititled to some smChristmas as the childi'e11 .a® ployed man. The NazareneJ®| back at the dawn of tory, said "Suffer come unto Me." In His ••fiSgl greatness all were eque' ing heart was with' t'ie and suffering. . If "Workman" wishes point why not protest legislators who will h^two weeks' holiday over season at a rate of sa'a/®|l than that which he dra ®® point for him, the law Dli|®ijj wisdom have granted j®|| full year's extra pay the life of Parliament w .BKm why pick on the under all the consideration ,®g| of all sections of the I only wish all wel to keep up the standar in consequence my the relief worker and no man" wh'ose plight pared with the 69, OM the unemployed of t|llS Hoping that an 'this up ,and thanking / JIKjl lowlng me tp present of view,— I am, etc.,

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/RMPOST19321215.2.27.1

Bibliographic details

Rotorua Morning Post, Volume 2, Issue 406, 15 December 1932, Page 4

Word Count
867

THE XMAS BONUS Rotorua Morning Post, Volume 2, Issue 406, 15 December 1932, Page 4

THE XMAS BONUS Rotorua Morning Post, Volume 2, Issue 406, 15 December 1932, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert