[?]MITH CASE
i-
Res disagree over ■ s of causing ■ fire BOSING THEORIES
•By Telegraph — Copyrlght) .
• 27, 8.40 p.m. Sydney, October 27. aikness, giving evidence izard Sniith libel action, 3'shed theories concerning the fire in Smith's car, , y conclusion he f ormed ^O1'oign substance had re could be deliberately 1 3 petrol soaked rag, and i jme running, there could ti* u 111 P^'^iug up a spark as the rag. '^Phson, a consulting P°sed that it was not pos- . Se a fire in the manner 5" Plaintiff, Smith. Witness n, e °pini0n that a fire y ^00Peoing the clip 0j suPply pipe and allowr . ,° aoze out slowly and ^ ?ai'k froin a plug.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/RMPOST19321028.2.27
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Rotorua Morning Post, Volume 2, Issue 365, 28 October 1932, Page 5
Word count
Tapeke kupu
111[?]MITH CASE Rotorua Morning Post, Volume 2, Issue 365, 28 October 1932, Page 5
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
NZME is the copyright owner for the Rotorua Morning Post. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of NZME. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in