TRAFFIC INSPECTOR'S SALARY
"CROSSROADS"
Sir. — The report on the above at the Borough Gouncil meeting last week, strikes many of us as being : ill-primed. This is hardly the moment for an inerease in any officer's salary when it is considered how many
' are barely existing in this borough. If there is an inerease in the amount of work, of the inspector through the existence of the Transport Board, then let the job be divided between two, thereby causing employment for at least one other. The Borongh Inspector, I believe also does a eertain amount of County Council work, being supplied with a car etc., by that body. Why does not the County Council imdertake its own traffie control ? It could do so at yery little extra expense (if any) and I see from the report that it is subsidised for traffie cpptrol by the Highways Board, I know for a fact that for many months past the work of the County employees has been rqtioned to 3 weeks out of four. By assuming its own control it would possibly ease the position for its rationed workers. I an> etc. i I li&i
Rotorua; June 6 1932.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/RMPOST19320607.2.57.3
Bibliographic details
Rotorua Morning Post, Volume 2, Issue 245, 7 June 1932, Page 7
Word Count
196TRAFFIC INSPECTOR'S SALARY Rotorua Morning Post, Volume 2, Issue 245, 7 June 1932, Page 7
Using This Item
NZME is the copyright owner for the Rotorua Morning Post. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of NZME. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in