Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

LAND VALUATION

(Press. Assn.-

LOCAL BODIES' DIFFICUj| BROUGHT BEFORE ■ MlNiISTER fl AMENDMENT OF ACT W.B

— By Telegraph — Cofl

WELLINGTON,® The difficulties of certain lo® ies in the present circumsta® depression through the oper^B two clauses of the Valuation fl Act led to the organisation fl putation to the Minister of LaH Hon E. A. Ransom, to-day by ifl rinsville Borough Gouncil. H On hehalf of 29 local aufl the rfepal was asked of Sefl| of the Act under which ov»l land may seek revaluation jH property, and also of sub-se-Mj of section 45, which prescijll in the event of the acquisitidji which is offered to the Cro'wMB ing approved the capital valulH reduced to the amount spr-lfl owner as a fair value. ffl In lieu of the latter prc|fl was urged that the land :|H offered to the public and ufl sale was effected within threefl the Valuer-General should rfll

Replying to the deputati^B Ransom said he fully recog^B difficulty some boroughs we^H in especially those with rati^H improved value, hut periodi^H tions would be vexy costlyM would he impossible to getjM valuers to do the work effic^H did not think it right to de^l indiyidual the right to app^H valuation, nor did he think f(^H ent that such a proposal H passed by Parliament. H Referring to the operatioM section (c) of section 45, 1^1 thought a property should to the publie as well as to tflB There had been extraorfl| amples of applications bejH for revaluations, and one of^H extraordinary in recent tiisH case in which an owner ot^H acres of land for a £5 owner was entitled to his on that basis and escape^H rates, unloading his liabii^H other rate payers in the diaH Mr. Ranson said he wotil^H carefully into the suggest^H sion of the operation of He did not think it was the moment, even if it werc^B to repeal Section 50 of questioned whether it wa^H to deny the individual tli^H apply- for revaluations. both representations woul^B into carefully. In revisiflj valuation at the present icularly in boroughs whicI^H the unimproved value, th^H would be to place heavier occupied sections and to^^H to vacaxit sections. _^fl

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/RMPOST19320304.2.15

Bibliographic details

Rotorua Morning Post, Volume 1, Issue 164, 4 March 1932, Page 4

Word Count
362

LAND VALUATION Rotorua Morning Post, Volume 1, Issue 164, 4 March 1932, Page 4

LAND VALUATION Rotorua Morning Post, Volume 1, Issue 164, 4 March 1932, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert