NOT DISTURBED
APPLICATION. EOR. VARL4' OF MAINTENANCE ORDER A further instalment of a ?epi : qase recently decided in Te Pu heard ijj thp Rqtqrua Mpgii Court yesterday when Innes Shaw, a motor salesman, came Mr. S. L. Paterspn, S.M., aski a variation of a maintehance fixed at the time his wife, Shaw, obtained a separation against ihe petitioner at Te Mr. Hampsoi) appeqred for and Mr. H. O. Cooney for th After hearing evidence coxit Shaw's present circumstance Magistrate stated that he had nothing additionalj to the facts had been placed before him Puke. He stated that he was fled from the attitude of the coi ant that he was not trying ti his obligations to his wife, an nothing had been adduced whicl be considered sufficient groun disturbing the order.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/RMPOST19311208.2.17
Bibliographic details
Rotorua Morning Post, Volume 1, Issue 91, 8 December 1931, Page 4
Word Count
131NOT DISTURBED Rotorua Morning Post, Volume 1, Issue 91, 8 December 1931, Page 4
Using This Item
NZME is the copyright owner for the Rotorua Morning Post. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of NZME. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in