Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

BROKEN HILL DISPUTE.

THE JUDGE’S AWARD.

United Press Association— By Blec- ;:. i '>c.-;/;-:;.trio= , Telegr»phr-:Oopyrigii6. Melbourne, March 12. .. Judge Higgins was occupied *wo hoars in delivering the Arbitration award in the Broken Hill dispute. ■Great interest was manifested and *he Court was crowded. Basing the award on the deduction that the cost of\living was '£2 4s 5d on the Barrier and £2 2s 6>£d at Port Pirie, Judge Higgins fixed the minimum wage for, unskilled labour at-the Barrier at ■€s and at Port Pirie at 8s 3(1, and the wages of miners at both places at 10s per day for a 48 hours’ week. The award, which lasts till 1910; leaves the contract system, at present in operation, untouched. The award upholds the claims for ’ increased wages but makes no order as to mining companies continuing in operation. Judge .Higgins said he fully reopgnised the terrible nature 'of the catastrophe that would be caused if the Proprietary Com* pany stopped working. He recognised to the full his responsibility in the matter, bnt, according to the general manager, the Company had not, more than two years and a half of;full work before it. If a catastrophe did not happen to-day it was* bound to happen very soon. Business men and miners at the Barrier express satisfaction at the award, hut there-is some fear among the men that the big mine will not resume operations. Received March 13, 10.25 a.m. Sydney, March 13. The Sydney Morning Herald thinks that having a regard for the strenuous nature of the work at Broken Hill, few people will he inclined to cavil at the ( award. The point of the difficulty, however, is whether it is a basis of remuneration which the Company can accept aud continue work without loss. Judge Higgins in the award stated he strongly held the view that unless the circumstances were very exceptional the needy employer should under, the award pay at the same rate as his rich rival, otherwise it would he impossible to prevent sweating, the growth of parasitic enteritises or the spread of industrial unrest. The Proprietary Company will consider the award next week.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/RAMA19090313.2.25

Bibliographic details

Rangitikei Advocate and Manawatu Argus, Volume XXXIV, Issue 9393, 13 March 1909, Page 5

Word Count
355

BROKEN HILL DISPUTE. Rangitikei Advocate and Manawatu Argus, Volume XXXIV, Issue 9393, 13 March 1909, Page 5

BROKEN HILL DISPUTE. Rangitikei Advocate and Manawatu Argus, Volume XXXIV, Issue 9393, 13 March 1909, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert