Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

BILLS OF A LADY OF FASHION

£2400 A YEAR FOR DRESS. Mrs Howard Gould’s demand in the New York Divorce Court for £30,000 a year alimony, is characterised by English authorities as excessive, even for the wife of a wealthy American.

The late President of the Divorce Court, when Sir Francis Jeune, laid it down that it was possible for a woman to keep up a position ia London society on an income of £2500 a year. This was the sum allowed Mrs Beecham, wife of the famous pill proprietor, whose income was stated to be £BO,OOO a year. Mrs Beecham’s protest that she could not afford a box at the opera or a winter at Cannes on £2500 a year met with no sympathy from the judge. The £40,000 per annum alimony allowed by the French Courts to the Countess Castellano constitutes a record; but the countess, as Miss Anna Gould, had brought great wealth to he aristocratic husband. Mrs Gould’s “list of necessaries” was subjected to expert analysis, with the following result The allowance of £2OO a month for the rent of an apartment and its furniture, said a West End house agent, would be excessive for London. Even in the season a wellfurnished house in the fashionable district can be rented for from £25 to £3O a week, and if taken for a whole year the rent would be less. Housekeeping bills, allowing for a staff of servants and a certain amount of entertaining, shored not exceed £25 a week—about 50 per cent, less than Mrs Gould's estimate —said a stores manager. The cost of living, however, is lower in London than in New York I For dress £2400 is a heavy allowance, remarked a well-known dressmaker. Some of the best-dressed English women spend less than £IOOO a year on their frocks, including their Court gowns. The £2O a month for hats and veils, observed a milliner, might be reduced by 20 per cent. The English society woman, living alone, would not find it necessary to employ j butler, cook, housemaid, lady’s-maid, kitchen-maid, coachman, glooms, stablemen, and chauffeur, said a Mayfair registry-office keeper. Such a staff as she would require could be supplied for £325 a year—about one-fourth of Mrs Gould’s estimate.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/RAMA19090102.2.44

Bibliographic details

Rangitikei Advocate and Manawatu Argus, Volume XXXIV, Issue 9334, 2 January 1909, Page 6

Word Count
375

BILLS OF A LADY OF FASHION Rangitikei Advocate and Manawatu Argus, Volume XXXIV, Issue 9334, 2 January 1909, Page 6

BILLS OF A LADY OF FASHION Rangitikei Advocate and Manawatu Argus, Volume XXXIV, Issue 9334, 2 January 1909, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert