Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.
THE EXHIBITION CASE.
Per Press Association. t , l , Wellington, May 1. ” In Scott v. the King, Mr Harper contended that Mr Muuro’s action was not authorised by the Commissioners aud neither they nor the Crown were liable for his acts. The fact that Scott t went into possession was not referable to the contract continued in the letters, but was in view of a formal contract being executed. At [the conclusion of argument judgment was reserved.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/RAMA19080501.2.43
Bibliographic details
Rangitikei Advocate and Manawatu Argus, Volume XXXIII, Issue 9134, 1 May 1908, Page 5
Word Count
76THE EXHIBITION CASE. Rangitikei Advocate and Manawatu Argus, Volume XXXIII, Issue 9134, 1 May 1908, Page 5
Using This Item
See our copyright guide for information on how you may use this title.
Log in