THE TOOTH-DRAWING CASE.
Per Press Association. Dnnediu, Dec. 4. The case of Harrison against the Loudon Dental Institute m which £2OOO damages wero claimed for injuries sustained through the drawing of a tooth, was concluded to-day. The jury found a verdict in favour of plaintiff for £IOOO. Tho verdict carries costs which are considerably over £IOO. Mr Adams, counsel tor defendants, Moses and Pittar intimated that ho would niovfl for a now trial on the ground that im verdict was against the weight ot evidence. „„„ , [Plaintiff claimed £2OOO t damages for permanent injuries to his throat and lungs, alleged to be due to the unskilful extraction of a tooth by defendant Moses. ]
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/RAMA19071205.2.15
Bibliographic details
Rangitikei Advocate and Manawatu Argus, Volume XXII, Issue 9019, 5 December 1907, Page 2
Word Count
112THE TOOTH-DRAWING CASE. Rangitikei Advocate and Manawatu Argus, Volume XXII, Issue 9019, 5 December 1907, Page 2
Using This Item
See our copyright guide for information on how you may use this title.
Log in