Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

COURT OF APPEAL.

Press Association. Wellington, July 17. lu Lysnar v. Dunlop, before the Appeal Court, an application to dismiss an order giving leave to appeal to the Privy Council on the ground that the appeal is not being diligently prosecuted, Mr Skerrett intimated that after looking into authorities he v/ah convinced that the motion could not succeed, but lie asked that in view of the novelty of the point in New Zealand costs should not be awarded. The Court decided it had no jurisdiction to discharge the order made, and the motion was dismissed without costs.;

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/RAMA19070717.2.22

Bibliographic details

Rangitikei Advocate and Manawatu Argus, Volume XXXII, Issue 8866, 17 July 1907, Page 2

Word Count
97

COURT OF APPEAL. Rangitikei Advocate and Manawatu Argus, Volume XXXII, Issue 8866, 17 July 1907, Page 2

COURT OF APPEAL. Rangitikei Advocate and Manawatu Argus, Volume XXXII, Issue 8866, 17 July 1907, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert