Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

WOMAN’S ASTONISHING “DISCOVERY.”

A ■woman, who declared that, another man wrs imper&onathig Ik * husband, and had socxeedrl in deceiving hor and hoc children for a considerable time, applied to the Magistrate at the Willesden Police Court for advice.

The man, she said, was almost the double of her husband, hut he was a little stouter. She declared that she had been married for 14 years, and could not ho mistaken. “Do yon mean to tell mo that you do not know your husband from another man?” said the Magistrate. “He is remarkably like him, only stouter”, was the reply; “out I am sure it is not my husband who is living with me now.” “When did the change take place?” the Magistrate asked. “I cannot say that. I first noticed it a few days ago.” “Have you spoken to him about it?” “Ho, I have not mentioned it to him yet. ” “Is lie kind to yon?” “Not so kind as my real husband. He was bad. enough, hut this man fairly wipes his foot on mo and ■walks over roe.” “Does ho act the same in other ways?” “Yes,*” said tiro woman: “ho comes home at night and Jars his tea ;uhl goes about tbo house in exactly the same way. Bos habits are very much the same.” ■ “Have you any children?” was the next question. “Yes; live,” was the reply. “And do they think ha is their fatner?” “Yes; they call him ‘Daddy. ’ ” “Now, don’t you think you arc under some dolus ion?” said the Magi.*strata. ‘ l l don't, sir, ’’ the woman insisted. “I am perfectly sure this man is not my husband, however much ho may be like him.” The Magistrate said it was the most extraordinary case lie ha t over hoard of, and ho advised the woman to bring the man to him if she could, that lie might inquire into the matter for lurnse!".

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/RAMA19070403.2.55

Bibliographic details

Rangitikei Advocate and Manawatu Argus, Volume XXXI, Issue 8777, 3 April 1907, Page 4

Word Count
319

WOMAN’S ASTONISHING “DISCOVERY.” Rangitikei Advocate and Manawatu Argus, Volume XXXI, Issue 8777, 3 April 1907, Page 4

WOMAN’S ASTONISHING “DISCOVERY.” Rangitikei Advocate and Manawatu Argus, Volume XXXI, Issue 8777, 3 April 1907, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert