Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE NEW HEBRIDES.

Press Association—Copyright. London, February IS, The Bight Hem, A, Lyttelton, in a letter to' the newspapers, declares that the attempt of Government in connection with the New Hebrides debate, to hide behind the cover of France’s responsibility, is not very brave, The colonies’ objections to the terms of the labor system were not mentioned to the French Government, London, February 18. The Westminster Gazette declares if Mr Churchill is correct that the repatriation clause is only compulsory on masters and not on natives, there is no analogy between the'arrangement in the New Hebrides ahd the Chinese Ordinances. It adds, “If this interpretation is wrong then revision is still possible.”

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/RAMA19070219.2.31

Bibliographic details

Rangitikei Advocate and Manawatu Argus, Volume XXXI, Issue 8744, 19 February 1907, Page 2

Word Count
112

THE NEW HEBRIDES. Rangitikei Advocate and Manawatu Argus, Volume XXXI, Issue 8744, 19 February 1907, Page 2

THE NEW HEBRIDES. Rangitikei Advocate and Manawatu Argus, Volume XXXI, Issue 8744, 19 February 1907, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert