Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SUPREME COURT.

Per Press Association. Wellington, February 3.

At the Supreme Court, John Burke was found guilty of a criminal assault on a girl, seven years of age, and was sentenced to seven years’ penal servitude, and ordered to receive two floggings of twenty-five lashes. His Honor said no case had ever been before him in which such brutal conduct by man to child, whose innocence and imbecility should have been her protection, had been so clearly proved. James Ellis, James Gerard, and George Williams, charged with assault and robbery, were acquitted. The Grand Jury threw out the bill charging Win O’Brien and Palmer Spry, of the City Fire Brigade, with manslaughter of Amy Kensington. . Before being discharged the Grand Jury submitted two presentments to the Court. Tho first one was, “Wo respectfully’ beg to draw your Honor’s, attention to tiio system brought under our notice during tfio giving of evidence, and acknowledged to obtain in business houses, of allowing special discounts on the private accounts of officers of public bodies. In tho case directly brought under our notice, a discount of 25 per cent was allowed. Wo respectfully contend that such a system is to commercial life, and in particular oilers incentives to obtaining contracts by methods which cannot bo regarded as strictly honest.” Tho second presentment was with regard to statements made by a girl to'tho police, tho Grand Jury suggesting that such statements should only bo taken in the presence of a witness.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/RAMA19070206.2.29

Bibliographic details

Rangitikei Advocate and Manawatu Argus, Volume XXXI, Issue 8733, 6 February 1907, Page 2

Word Count
246

SUPREME COURT. Rangitikei Advocate and Manawatu Argus, Volume XXXI, Issue 8733, 6 February 1907, Page 2

SUPREME COURT. Rangitikei Advocate and Manawatu Argus, Volume XXXI, Issue 8733, 6 February 1907, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert