RESULTS INVALUABLE.
Were tlio results of his work in you* judgment valuable?—l should describe them as invaluable.
Concluding, Lord French said there was no cause for Mr. Moore's le.-.vinj, except the call of his private iffairs, and there was no foundation wlmcvii for the imputations. In the witness box, Mr. Moo.o said he was born in Ontario. His father w..s a United States citizen, who fought in the Civil Wat. Since 1902 he had !>> C n chiefly engaged in the management and ownership of large constructional unuei takings.
Ha had had great experience in organising labour, and put his services at the disposal of the General Staff at the front. He know nothing of a special train having been placed at his disposal. He did not know Count Bernstorff, and had never Keen him There was not a word of truth in the imputations. Mr. G. Hewart, K.C., M.P., having expressed deep regret thai tlrs matt: r had inadvertently admitted into tliir newspaper, the Lord Chief Justice declared that these imputations wore wholly unfounded, i'hc record was accordingly withdrawn upon terms agreed, the defendants to pay costs.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/PWT19160519.2.19.38
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Pukekohe & Waiuku Times, Volume 5, Issue 175, 19 May 1916, Page 4 (Supplement)
Word count
Tapeke kupu
187RESULTS INVALUABLE. Pukekohe & Waiuku Times, Volume 5, Issue 175, 19 May 1916, Page 4 (Supplement)
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
See our copyright guide for information on how you may use this title.
Acknowledgements
Ngā mihi
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Auckland Libraries.