Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image

In an address to the Canterbury Philosophical Institute, Mr. H. E. West said that too often bread was underbaked (reports the Christchurch Times). The reason was an economic one, closely associated with i our laws of weights and measures. During the process of baking, a considerable quantity of water was evaporated. The longer the loaf was in the oven tbe greater was the loss of moisture. The laws of weights and measures- stipulated that a 41b loaf must weight 41b. The baker weighed out at least 41b 3oz of dough to make a 41b loaf of bread; if he baked the loaf too long more than 3oz of moisture was lost, and he automatically became subject to the penalty of selling short-weight bread. The result was that he was very careful not to overbake the loaf, and very often he under-baked it. Under-baked bread was neither palatable nor digestible and it had very poor keeping qualities. Certainly, it did not stimulate a desire for niore bread and less meat. The baker could alter that by weighing out another ounce of dough; that would cost money. Say that he had a trade of 4000 loaves per week, 4000 oz were equal to 250 loaves, or a loss ol £ls per week. The better wav would be to alter the laws to refer to dough weight rather than to weigh of loaf. The customer would get the same weight of dry matter per loaf of bread, and at the same time would receive a much better food.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/PUP19291024.2.44

Bibliographic details

Putaruru Press, Volume VII, Issue 311, 24 October 1929, Page 5

Word Count
255

Untitled Putaruru Press, Volume VII, Issue 311, 24 October 1929, Page 5

Untitled Putaruru Press, Volume VII, Issue 311, 24 October 1929, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert