PUTARURU COURT.

Putaruru Press, Volume VI, Issue 248, 2 August 1928, Page 6

PUTARURU COURT.

JUDGMENTS AND ORDERS. Judgments for plaintiff by default was given by Mr. S. JU Paterson, S.M., in the Putaruru Court, for the amounts mentioned, together with costs, as follows:

T.T.T. Company, Ltd. v. Stanley Read, £2, costs £1 2s; J. C. Tomalin v W. Peacock, £1 12s, costs 10s; Rose Bros, Ltd. v. C. Chilcott, £ll 15 S 7 d costs £2 18s; E. E. Fryer v. R. Dixon £7 16s 2d, costs £1 5s 6d; Putaruru Town Board v. C. T. Robertson, £4 3s Bd, costs £1 Us 6d; G . l Martin v. H. C. Morris, £3, costs £1 3s 6d- G L. Martin v. J. Middleton, £3 19s’7d costs £1 Cs Gd; A. E. Barr Brown v.’ E. Randell, £2 11s 4d, costs £1 17s 6d; J. M. Spear v. C. H. Kemp, £3B 14s Bd, costs £4 5s 6d; T.T.T. Company, Ltd. v. Tau Wilson £9, costs £2 9s 6d; S. Haslett v. C. Pavitt, £7 7s, costs £2 15s 6d; Rose Bros., Ltd. v. J. Lowtlier, £l4 2s lid, costs £2 19s; Rose

Bros.,- Ltd. v. C. B. Fitzgerald, £23 6s 2d, costs £5 0s fid; Rose Bros., Ltd.' v. Geo. Ngaio, £5 <hf fid, costs £2 5s fid; Rose Bros., Ltd. vi- T. Edwards, £7 4s 4d, costs £2 5s 6dV Rose Bros., Ltd. vi W. Yeats, £22 14s, costs £4 5s fid; Rose' Bros., Ltd. v. M. Clarke, £6 9s 9s, costs'£l 14s 6d; Rose Bros., Ltd. v. T. Butcher, £2 15s, costs £1 5s 6d; J. M. Spear v. J; Mutu, £73 16s 3d, costs £5 13s fid; A. J. Neville v. H. Mahood, £1 10s, costs 10s. An order was made against Taylor Irihei on a judgment summons, that the amount (£5 Is fid) bo paid forthwith, plus 15s 6d costs; in default 7 days’ in Rotorua.