KAITI BLOCK.
Hist have tor the past ten or Kn years overhang the title to this block Ky be looked upon as set at rest. We ref red to the ease the other day. Doubts as of the certificate of title issued section of the Native Land raised in consequence of an apfor a rehearing having been made It was alleged that therefore the to its original state, and became land, pure and simple. The question on the 4th of December last, when to restrain the issue of the subcertificates was disposed of. Judge decided that the allegations in the of claim were consistent with th? having de facto taken place before inasmuch as it appeared that had declined to call evidence. Ba that even if an Actual rehear |g were necessary the judge had Mrer under section 100 of the Native Md Aet, 1873, to adopt evidence previously Bn, after recalling witnesses and to confirm as to which the rehearing had been and that it might be reasonable to IgßVthat this course had been followed, with costs £2l, Mr. Gisborne, who was acting Native Land Court in the formed, will be entered in delay. ® a . v the most important some time in connection matters, and goes far to difficulties that thwarted settlement of the Haiti
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/PBS18841209.2.20
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Poverty Bay Standard, Volume I, Issue 305, 9 December 1884, Page 3
Word count
Tapeke kupu
216KAITI BLOCK. Poverty Bay Standard, Volume I, Issue 305, 9 December 1884, Page 3
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.