Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Supreme Court.

EXXTRAOBDINAUY SCENT’.. THE MONCKTON’S AGAIN. GRAY V. GRAY. [Own CORRESPONDENT.] Napier, December 8. In the Supreme Court yesterday, Thomas Slator, for forging a cheque on the Bank of New South Wales, got eighteen months• Henry Douglas, stealing (£44 at Kakapau, eighteen months ; HamieraKaraitiana, horse stealing, two years. Wm. Wilson, of the Armed Constabularyj was charged with committing perjury at the hearing of the assault case in the R.M. Court, brought by Lofley against other constables. After the jury had been deliberating nearly five hours, the foreman (Mr. C. W. Mackenzie) came into court and asked to be let off, as he was very ill. His Honor said he could not, and immediately Mr. MacKenzie fell back on the ground in a fit. His Honor then ordered the remainder of the jury to be called in, and told them that as their foreman wap too ill to attend to his duties they were discharged, and the case wilj be triedjfc novo on Thursday. Wilson was released on his own recognisance till then. Wellington, December 3.

In the Divorce Court yesterday, Gray v. Gray wan a petition by the wife for dissolution of marriage on the ground that the husband had been unable to consumate marriage. The case wae adjourned to enable the evidence of the husband to be taken by a Commissioner in Melbourne, Monckton v. Monckton was a petition by the wife for divorce on the ground of adultery and cruelty. Petitioner deposed she was 13 years and two months old when married, and had been induced to marry respondent by his threats and the persuasions of her sister, Mrs. Lynch, with whom respondent cohabited. Petitioner did not occupy the same room with respondent after marriage, but her sister did. The case was adjourned for argument as to cruelty. In Morris v. Morris a rule nisi was granted.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/PBS18841203.2.18

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Poverty Bay Standard, Volume I, Issue 300, 3 December 1884, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
310

Supreme Court. Poverty Bay Standard, Volume I, Issue 300, 3 December 1884, Page 2

Supreme Court. Poverty Bay Standard, Volume I, Issue 300, 3 December 1884, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert