Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

GISBORNE HARBOR BOARD.

The fortnightly meeting of the above was held last night. All the members being pre* teat. The minutes were read and confirmed, after slight alterations. Incoming Correspondence, The Clerk read three telegrams he had received from Wellington, re the Turanganui Bridge, as under:—(l.) “ Plans of the Turahganui Bridge, to be submitted Governer for approval at the next meeting of the Executive Council, probably Tuesday next.” (2.) “ Plans await Executive Council, Governor's signature. Are approved finally. G. S. Whitmore.” (3.) “On first arrival got Minister to forward plans to Mr. Seed, he has now given up Waimata, and will send documents direct to be sent by the Governor.” Mr. Nolan, solictor to the Board forwarded a letter, received from his Wellington agent* which stated: —The objection on which the judgment turned was the only one they had feared. The only other argument was that the by-law was void. The judge did not think so, though it was not necessary to decide the point, as he thought the information defective, on the ground that it was not stated that the defendant shipped the goods. His Honor said the by-law could not mean that mere intention, not carried into effect, was to be punished. He argued that “ before loading” imported, that there must have been a loading, but the judge said it should not be left to implication. The Chairman—l move that the letter be referred back to Mr. Nolan, and he be asked for further information on the matter on every point. This was resolved on. Engineer’s Report. The Engineer’s Report was read, but contained nothing of importance, and was adopted/ Payments. Reynolds, £5 ss; Slack, £3; Wharfinger* £6 ; C. McDeavitt, £4 10s. Deepening the River. Mr. Tutchen suggested that the operations should be commenced for deepening the river, by driving a large pile in the middle of the river above the wharf, and fencing off the other side so as to turn the flow of water ail on to this side, to wash the silt away at the wharf. The present harrow, he thought, was of no use whatever. Mr. Smith suggested driving piles down from Common & Co.’s, and turn the flow that way. Members considered that impracticable. Discussion ensued on the question, and it was decided that the Public Works Committee and the Engineer should inspect the work, and draw up a report on it.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/PBS18840625.2.13

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Poverty Bay Standard, Volume I, Issue 166, 25 June 1884, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
398

GISBORNE HARBOR BOARD. Poverty Bay Standard, Volume I, Issue 166, 25 June 1884, Page 2

GISBORNE HARBOR BOARD. Poverty Bay Standard, Volume I, Issue 166, 25 June 1884, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert