RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT.-GISBORNE.
'xItVBSDAT. [Before J. Booth, Esq., R.M.] Ward v. McKay, Teat & Co. His Worship now gave judgment in the above case, i r e had gone care- > fully over the evid. nee, and had come to the conclusion that the plaintiff had failed to make cut his case. The plaintiff must be n ,'-united. Mr Kenny wished, to know on which of the three re--wed points his Worship had decided the case. His Worship said on no point. He should give a nonsuit, with costs, £6 Ils. Ebipay, J ply 27. W. L. Rees v. Karaitiana and others. —This was a claim for £77. Adjourned to August 10. Parnell & Boylan v. Haache.— Claim £lB 7s 2d. No appearance, struck out. Thelwall & Co. v. J. Mvllooly.— Claim for £3 4s. Struck out. Hubble v. Black.—Claim £1 2s. Struck out. Piha v. R. Kabaka.—Claim £2 5s for work done. Judgment for £1 with costs, 13s.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/PBS18830728.2.21
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Poverty Bay Standard, Volume XI, Issue 1335, 28 July 1883, Page 3
Word count
Tapeke kupu
155RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT.-GISBORNE. Poverty Bay Standard, Volume XI, Issue 1335, 28 July 1883, Page 3
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in