RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT—GISBORNE.
[Before J. Booth, Esq., R.M.] TrksDAY, June 19th. COMMON SHELTON & CO. V. MULLOOI.Y. This was a claim for £BO 12s. 9d* for goods sold and delivered. Judgment was given for pliihtifi'a for £77 3s. and UOsts amounting in al) to £2 Bs. BOLTON V. LEGGATT. This was an action to recover the sum of £9 for a cow sold and delivered to defendant. Mr. Nolan appeared for plaintiff, and Mr. Kenny for defendant. The defence pleaded a set off by medical attendance, and fraudulent representation with respect to the cow. It appeared that the plaintiff in this case had agreed to supply defendant with a milk cow which had just calved, whereas the one defendant received had calved some four months previous to delivery. Upon the plaintiff being remonstrated with he had agreed to change the cow and replace it by one that would fulfil the Conditions of contract. This he bad failed to do. The defendant’s bill against plaintiff was originally for £6 15s. 6d„ but at. the request oi plaintiff the defendant had agreed to reduce his account from £0 18s. od. to £4 17s. This reduction was made on account of the plaintiff having promised to pay cash. The usual medical fees was 10«. fid. per mile. As the account had not been paid the defendant considered himself entitled to claim the original amount. Mr. Kenny addressed the Court > and submitted that his client was entitled to a verdict. The vendor had been guilty of misrepresentation and consequent fraud, thus tendering null and void any contract that might have been entered into. He quoted numerous authorities in support of his case* and confidently submitted that his client was entitled to a verdict. Mr. Nolan, on behalf of plaintiff, submitted that the sole cause of the cow not giving a larger quantity of milk was inferior pasturage, and poor feed. Judgment for plaintiff for £5 and costs, £1 2a. The amount not exceeding £5, no solicitors fees were allowed.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/PBS18830621.2.10
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Poverty Bay Standard, Volume XI, Issue 1319, 21 June 1883, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
334RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT—GISBORNE. Poverty Bay Standard, Volume XI, Issue 1319, 21 June 1883, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.