CORRESPONDENCE.
Wo rfo not hold ourselvas responsible for the opinions expresaod by our correspondents]. :o: O U R NEW R.M, TO THE EDITOR, <ir, —As a frequenter of the R.M. Court I have had many occasions of judging of the qualifications of our new Magistrate, and I regret to think that he is far from being the successor to Mr Price we wanted. His partiality to one of the members of the bar s<» apparent, us to be openly talked about On Friday he nonsuited Mr Boland in his ease against Mr Walker, although tho plaintiff had sworn that the defendant had said that he, and not Mr Locke, was the person responsible. In Greenwood v. Thomson he gave a cruel, and according to the evidence in my mind, an illegal judgment against poor Thomson. In both cases the same counsel represented the successful litigants. I am &c., Onlooker,
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/PBS18830410.2.15
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Poverty Bay Standard, Volume XI, Issue 1306, 10 April 1883, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
149CORRESPONDENCE. Poverty Bay Standard, Volume XI, Issue 1306, 10 April 1883, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in