CORRESPONDENCE.
We do not boll oureelvee roeponalble foe the oplnioai expressed by our correspondentej. JOYCK V GRAHAM & KINROSS. TO THZ EDITOR, Si*,—Thomaa Campbell said “ coming event* cast their shadows before,” it seems to me to be very applicable to the above ease. la it not a true fact that yesterday District Judge Smith, and my opposing counsel, Brassey, drove out together ? And is it a fact that Mr Brassey was offering two one, to any person who wished to take himY up, that he would win the ease P And it it not a fact that Mr Graham stated to ma yesterday, that it was very bdd how Mi Brassey was offering two to one that he would win ? And is it not very odd that District Judge Smith in his summing up should term the defendant “ Mr Graham " and the com. plainant only, “ Joyce " P Thia remind* one of Justice’s Justice. Io it not also a known fact that 11 Joyce ” is ae honourable in his transactions as his Judge, hie opposing counsel, or the defendant.—l am &o„ E. P. Jorca. Gisborne, Jan. 26, 1883.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/PBS18830126.2.13
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Poverty Bay Standard, Volume XI, Issue 1259, 26 January 1883, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
186CORRESPONDENCE. Poverty Bay Standard, Volume XI, Issue 1259, 26 January 1883, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in