Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SINGULAR CLERICAL LIBEL SUIT.

At the Chester Assizes, on Monday, Mr Justice Lindley am! a jury were engaged for the greater part of the 'day in trying an action in which the Rev. J. Thomas, curate of Rhyl, claimed damages from Mrs Maria Power, a widow of independent means, for slander. It appears that Sept ember last plaintiff met Mrs Power’s daughter aged 15, in company with a sailor, the son of a local innkeeper a id, regarding the disparity in their position, he mentioned the matter to the rector of Rhyl, who, in turn told Mrs Power. Mrs and Miss Power absented themselves from the church, and subsequently, in the course oi conversation with a lady member 0; the congregation, Mrs Power ventured to “ hope that the new curate would be more satisfactory than Mr Thomas as he did nothing but tell lies.” The result was that Mr Thomas’s character and reputation had suffered. Mr Higgins, in defence, submitted that on the 2nd of September, the day spicified, Miss Power was not walking out with the sailor boy ; and secondly that no slander had" been uttered. Speaking of the plaintiff’s conduct, be said there appeared to be altogther a refinement of clerical duty in the parish of Rhyl, which had reached its highest pitch when the curate considered it necessary to guard over the welfare of his people to such an extent as to try to prevent a person of one social position conversing with a person of another. Evidence for the defence having been called, the jury retired, and after a brief absence returned into the court with a verdict for the plaintiff. At his Lordship suggestion, however, they retired again in order to consider what damages they should assess, and on returning awarded plaintiff the nominal damages of one shilling.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/PBS18820530.2.16

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Poverty Bay Standard, Volume X, Issue 1080, 30 May 1882, Page 4

Word count
Tapeke kupu
303

SINGULAR CLERICAL LIBEL SUIT. Poverty Bay Standard, Volume X, Issue 1080, 30 May 1882, Page 4

SINGULAR CLERICAL LIBEL SUIT. Poverty Bay Standard, Volume X, Issue 1080, 30 May 1882, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert