Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image

Yesterday morning the main thoroughfare of Gisborne’s generally quiet town, was the scene of a fracas, such as, we are glad to say, seldom occurs. It appears that Mr. J. Gannon —brother of Mr. M. J. Gannon, and on a visit to him from Australia—accosted Mr. Hy. McKay, the editor of the Poverty Bay Herald, whip in hand, and accused him of publishing, in his journal, certain libellous and defamatory statements reflecting on himself, and his family connections both here and elsewhere. As usual, an altercation took place, ending in Mr. Gannon laying his whip, three or four times on Mr. McKay’s shoulders. Mr. McKay did not retaliate, and after the usual excitement, the parties separated. Other proceedings, will, doubtless, be taken, which we do not desire to anticipate. Our more immediate desire is to remark on the regretableness of the fact that the public business of life cannot be conducted between men—-who, in a small community like that of Gisborne, are in each other’s company several times during each day of the week —without the introduction of matter, which is a disgrace to the perpetrator, and painful—severely, unnecessarily painful—to the feelings of the person to whom it is addressed. We purposely refrain from quoting the cause which led to the recent chastisement—the editor of the Herald being the guardian of his own acts and deeds —but we should fall short of our duty did we not express great regret at the circumstance that rendered that chastisement necessary. So far the candidates, and their several supporters, both in the newspapers, and at public meetings have comported themselves in a way that reflected great credit on all concerned. In fact, it has been a common remark that quieter and more orderly electioneering is seldom to be met with. But all of a sudden, the wedge is inserted, and split goes the whole trunk. We dotrust that the “ Catholic ” question, as a denominational one, will be dropped ; for the cause must be a poor one that brings a man’s religious belief into discussion in order to support it.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/PBS18811124.2.7

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Poverty Bay Standard, Volume IX, Issue 1003, 24 November 1881, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
346

Untitled Poverty Bay Standard, Volume IX, Issue 1003, 24 November 1881, Page 2

Untitled Poverty Bay Standard, Volume IX, Issue 1003, 24 November 1881, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert