RESIDENT MAGISTRATES’ COURT.
Gisborne, Tuesday, June 1, 1875. Before W. K. Nesbitt, Esq., R.M. CLARKE V. CLEMENTS. Claim £lO, value and detention of certain tools and personal clothing &c., the property of plaintiff. It appears that the plaintiff sold his house recently to defendant in which certain enumerated articles were at the time of sale, and on application defendant refused to give them up. On being sworn, plaintiff denied having sold the goods ; but, on the contrary, defendant declared positively that it was understood everything on the property was included in the sale. Judgment for plaintiff for amount claimed, to be reduced to £3 2s 6d, on return of goods mentioned in particulars. BEAD V. KELLY. Claim £6, amount stated to have been credited twice in settlement of account. Judgment for plaintiff. WEBB V. BENSON. Claim, £6 8s 6d. Judgment for plaintiff. WEBB V. DAWSON. Claim, £3 4s. Judgment confessed. BLAIN V. BIDGOOD. Claim, £27 10s 4d, balance of account. Adjourned to Tuesday the Bth June. A number of. other cases were proceeding when the Court adjourned.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/PBS18750602.2.11
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Poverty Bay Standard, Volume III, Issue 277, 2 June 1875, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
177RESIDENT MAGISTRATES’ COURT. Poverty Bay Standard, Volume III, Issue 277, 2 June 1875, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in