CORRESPONDENCE.
|_owr columns are open for discussion; but do not hold ourselves responsible for the opinions of our Correspondents ’] TO THE EDITOR. Sib, —In one of your late issues, appears a remark on the notorious ease of Macfarlane and Craig of Auckland. Now, I am forced to conclude that Mr. Thomas Craig is legally victimised, through a series of deep-laiil schemes of respectable quibblers. In other words he has become the fly under the protection of the spider, ami it does not require tin- foresight of a spaewife to point to the spider.—l am, &c., Earnest.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/PBS18740725.2.12
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Poverty Bay Standard, Volume II, Issue 190, 25 July 1874, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
96CORRESPONDENCE. Poverty Bay Standard, Volume II, Issue 190, 25 July 1874, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in