RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT.
Thursday, Maacp 20. [Before W. K. Nesbitt, Esq., R.M.] Parnell v. Raniera te Heu Heu. —Debt £7 9s 3d. • Judgment for amount. '■ Parnell v. Takahirangi.—Debt £11,75. i ) Z ■ ' 7 Read v.’ Tarr.—Balance of account, £5O. Judgment for amount. Foster an® Axtokasox v. Winter.—This was a disputed claim for a balance stated by the plaintiffs to.be due to them as the transferees-of a contract, let by the defendant to Mr. Hales, while acting as Engineer to the Rpad Board. Defendant admitted an overpayment to Hales of Bs, which Hales acknowledged and handed over to Mr. Winter. The Court could not see that the odd 4d was recoverable, from the defendant, and 'gave judgment for 811 accordingly
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/PBS18730322.2.9
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Poverty Bay Standard, Volume I, Issue 37, 22 March 1873, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
118RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT. Poverty Bay Standard, Volume I, Issue 37, 22 March 1873, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in