Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE ANNEXATION QUESTION.

Lord Derby’s Replyi , [REUTERS— COPYRIGHT.;] MELBOURNE, Sept 15. The Agent-General in ; London .Kas telegraphed to Mr Service that the Colonial Office has replied to the joint letter of the colonial Agent s-Geheral on the subject of proposed annexation in the Pacific. The reply ; was deemed unsatisfactory. Lord Derby admits the care and ability displayed in the preparation of the historical statement which was referred to the consideration of Sir Arthur Gordon and the Admiralty. Lord Derby doubts whether so much ignorance prevails in Australia regarding the claims of Foreign Powers as the AgentsGeneral apprehend. Samoa and Tonga bane been long recognised as independent; and, moreover, France, since 1878 had respected the independence of New Hebrides thdngb the position of the latter in relation to the Foreign Powers cannot be ignored. Referring to the Solomon Islands, Lord Derby expresses the opinion that the Colonial Government had hardly considered the responsibility attaching to their assumption. The Imperial Government was not satisfied that annexation was necessary or justifiable. His Lordship says that he has

nothing to add concerning New Guinea, and concludes by stating that if Colonial Governments desire to bear the cost of the measures proposed in the AgentsGoneral memorandum, and will confer and make the proposal concerning other islands not subject to treaty such proposals will .receive the attention of Government.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/PATM18830917.2.25

Bibliographic details

Patea Mail, Volume IX, Issue 1087, 17 September 1883, Page 3

Word Count
223

THE ANNEXATION QUESTION. Patea Mail, Volume IX, Issue 1087, 17 September 1883, Page 3

THE ANNEXATION QUESTION. Patea Mail, Volume IX, Issue 1087, 17 September 1883, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert