Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Local Option in Patea.

Only a small interest was shown by the Voting !yesterday on the : question liquor licenses may be increased or not by the- Licensing Committee during the next three years. Where few people vote, it must .be 'inferred that few people care. This indifference is not surprising, for the existence of a Licensing. Committee . argues that some discretionary power should be allowed to it ; The local public have practically allowed that discretionary power, as shown by the ballot thus; For increase of publicans’ licenses, 30 votes; against increase, 11. For increase' of N.Z. wine licenses, 29 votes ; against increase, 13. Mr Eytou acted as presiding officer at the polling. Three, votes were informal. .

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/PATM18820406.2.15

Bibliographic details

Patea Mail, 6 April 1882, Page 3

Word Count
116

Local Option in Patea. Patea Mail, 6 April 1882, Page 3

Local Option in Patea. Patea Mail, 6 April 1882, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert